|
|
|
Froger
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: October 29, 2013, 10:27:49 AM » |
0
|
Okay had an outcome . Spoke to Waddingtons today and they have assured me that this outrigger is a replacement for the EH outrigger and will fit into an FC when adapted to a HR front end ..
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Mid Nth Coast , NSW
|
|
|
|
Froger
|
|
« Reply #2 on: October 29, 2013, 08:13:11 PM » |
0
|
What! No one has any input into this ? Would be interested to know if anyone else would consider using this outrigger instead of having to chase up a Eh or earlier outrigger for this swap over !
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Mid Nth Coast , NSW
|
|
|
|
mcl1959
|
|
« Reply #3 on: October 29, 2013, 09:21:48 PM » |
0
|
OK the only reason why I wouldn't use one is the price. I could get an FB to EJ one for less than $20 if I needed one. I guess if you had no access to any early wrecks they would be worth considering.
Ken
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Froger
|
|
« Reply #4 on: October 29, 2013, 09:44:58 PM » |
0
|
Thanks Ken . Would be more then happy to use an original one if anyone has one to part with.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Mid Nth Coast , NSW
|
|
|
|
hsv-001
|
|
« Reply #5 on: October 30, 2013, 08:43:59 AM » |
0
|
I started to reply to this yesterday but got distracted .When I was doing these conversions we had to use what ever the customer provided . At a quick look , the step up at the front would suggest that it sits lower on the crossmember or is not as deep at the back . It could be to allow room for a front mounted rack . Normally I would take a pie cut from each sid of the outrigger and pull the back down lower to give around 60mm width where it welds to the crossmember so the rack would sit over the top . We had an old subframe as a jig when welding these on but under and out will also work . Whatever outrigger you use it is important to get it in the right position and the right angle onto the crossmember . Cheers
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
FireKraka
|
|
« Reply #6 on: October 30, 2013, 12:23:51 PM » |
0
|
Hi Froger;
When I did my HR x-member conversion I removed the FC outrigger from the old x-member and welded it to the HR x-member it fits up perfect with the mount under the radiator!!
Regards
Neil H
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Froger
|
|
« Reply #7 on: October 30, 2013, 03:53:04 PM » |
0
|
Thanks for the feedback Fellas.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Mid Nth Coast , NSW
|
|
|
Crumpsnr
Senior Member
 Offline
Model: FC
Posts: 286
Shellharbour NSW
|
|
« Reply #8 on: October 30, 2013, 04:51:20 PM » |
0
|
It's interesting you say that Neil. I did the same but I find there are many on the forum who say it doesn't work (or maybe doesn't work as well as others, don't quote me!) and that EH is the go. I'll find out soon enough once i get to that stage on mine. Martyn
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
mcl1959
|
|
« Reply #9 on: October 30, 2013, 08:19:39 PM » |
0
|
Heres the deal.
There were issues with FE & FC front crossmembers. They would bend and crack and would get wear in the wishbone spindles.
The replacement part for an FE or FC in later years was an FB EK front end because they superceded the older front end.
So there were plenty of FE & FC's with later cross members in them.
A stock standard FE FC front crossmember cannot have the outrigger cut off and welded to a HR front crossmember without modification.
Ken
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Crumpsnr
Senior Member
Offline
Model: FC
Posts: 286
Shellharbour NSW
|
|
« Reply #10 on: October 30, 2013, 08:47:43 PM » |
0
|
Thanks Ken. So if I understand correctly does that mean there's a chance Neil and I might have unknowingly had later front ends, which had an outrigger that worked with HR? How good is the internet. There was no way of getting this sort of help years ago! Regards, Martyn
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
fink
|
|
« Reply #11 on: October 30, 2013, 08:52:59 PM » |
0
|
Hey Fred,if your in Melb,bring it around and i'll weld it up 4 you.Gaz! Just PM me,ok!  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
hsv-001
|
|
« Reply #12 on: October 31, 2013, 09:26:47 AM » |
0
|
Thanks Ken ,you made it clear for everyone . The fe crossmember was extremely shallow through the dip in the middle the fc also had this dip . This makes the outrigger to crossmember the wrong angle and also the front mounting block . Its not a difficult mod. for anyone with an angle grinder and a mig. Cheers
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Froger
|
|
« Reply #13 on: October 31, 2013, 11:53:58 AM » |
0
|
Hey Fred,if your in Melb,bring it around and i'll weld it up 4 you.Gaz! Just PM me,ok! Your on Gaz be there on the weekend , road trip |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Mid Nth Coast , NSW
|
|
|
|
FireKraka
|
|
« Reply #14 on: October 31, 2013, 05:44:39 PM » |
0
|
Hi Ken Thanks for the information I have always wondered why people were saying they had difficulty when I had done mine and it seemed straight forward. When I was looking at the tech info page and I punched in what I thought was the original engine number it told me it was a later engine so this fits with what you are saying and I assume now that when somebody changed the engine they also changed the x-member. I have just picked up a FC ute that needs a lot of TLC, can you tell me the real diffrences so I know if this has also been changed, apparenly there is no chassis number and I dont have the engine number yet so possibility is that it also has been changed at some stage. I will get the ID plate numbers for you when I remember how to post pictures  Regards Neil H |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
mcl1959
|
|
« Reply #15 on: October 31, 2013, 08:37:17 PM » |
0
|
It's difficult to tell just by looking at it with the engine in. What you should be able to see is that the FE FC crossmember is curved across the centre under the sump, whilst the FB EK one is flatter across the centre. The outriggers look the same until you hold them up side to side.
Ken
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Froger
|
|
« Reply #16 on: November 01, 2013, 12:02:18 AM » |
0
|
Don't want to rock the boat here ,but why couldn't we have a sticky in the Tech section or Mod section on HR front end installment , out riggers .variant brake set ups ,pictures maybe ? I spent a heap of time chasing up old threads for information on the subject as I'm think'n a lot of other members have on this subject as it's pretty much a standard mod over the years ..Maybe I missed a Sticky on the subject .
I've seen the post Ken has provided from the past which could be the head post in the thread.
If it's not been done already what do use reckon ?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Mid Nth Coast , NSW
|
|
|
|
NES304
|
|
« Reply #17 on: November 01, 2013, 06:18:39 AM » |
0
|
Gotta be honest mate I don't know why you want a sticky on outriggers specifically in hr cross members. A lot of members are now using tubular setups to be able to use power steer, unmodified sumps and larger rotors. Eg pat gardners front cross member.
Out of my build that was the least considered mod I had (for a 5L injected 304). I butchered an Ej cross member and installed a HR front which is Four bolts and held the outrigger in place to weld.
Using a good caliper and rotor setup then may be worth a sticky but there are so many different combinations for different budgets or because of wheel choice it would be difficult to create a good sticky.
Might pay to go through some ones build pages and if you like it the roll with it. Crap pun intended.
My two cents...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hsv-001
|
|
« Reply #19 on: November 01, 2013, 08:23:13 AM » |
0
|
NES304 is correct . If I was new to this forum and everybody was doing the same conversions or was std original I would turn it off .I spend time on this forum to help people and am always impressed with the variety of ideas . Here is an example ,prior to the mid 80's in QLD it was illegal to install red motors in FX to EH . I still have a 138cu red motor with a starfire 4 speed and LC LJ tailshaft . It sat over a EH frontend and used a HG clutch fork and a FC fluid slave cylinder with the help of a adaptor plate to piviot the in reverse . Does that need a sticky? Sorry for being sarcastic. Regards Haydn
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
