FE-FC Holden Discussion Forum
November 17, 2024, 01:16:23 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: The FE-FC Holden Car Club of NSW are proud to host the 19th FE-FC Holden Nationals. Check out the announcement video for more.
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Add bookmark  |  Print  
Author Topic: Reproduction FC Escutcheon Plates  (Read 4293 times)
fcfromscratch
wa-club
Senior Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 369

FC - Fantastic Cars


View Profile
« on: July 29, 2003, 09:57:43 AM »
0

Would you be interested in a set of reproduction FC dash board escutcheon plates that fit under/around the 4 control switches.  It seems that they are hard to come by in good condition, how about a reproduction item similar to the boot badges that Graham Fuller has done recently??
Logged
slim
Guru
*****
Offline Offline

Model: FE and FC
Posts: 2328


Ring 0420768346 for genuine FE/FC parts.


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: July 29, 2003, 08:43:46 PM »
0

If they are a good repro I would be interested in Quite a few sets, I will keep an eye out for the finished Item .
Logged

Im located at Liverpool, NSW
Ed
Guru
*****
Offline Offline

Model: FE
Posts: 3311



Ed74mnd
View Profile
« Reply #2 on: July 29, 2003, 10:05:32 PM »
0

Sounds a good idea, but hard to submit an opinion on without seeing a prototype.



Logged

in the shed
fastjbav6
wa-club
Senior Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 494


OK start her up !


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: July 30, 2003, 12:04:19 AM »
0

Good idea, perhaps FE repo's as well or which ever is cheaper to make.
If i'm not mistaken the 1954 model chev had the same surrounds.

Regards
             Seb
Logged

Yellow Knight
             
FC0058
qld-club
Guru
*****
Offline Offline

Model: FC
Posts: 2128



Jim Altmann
View Profile
« Reply #4 on: July 30, 2003, 08:27:16 AM »
0

Great Idea.
I would buy a couple of sets, however the price would play apart as to how many I purchased.

Vote place.
Logged

Forgiveness is easier than permission.
Cat
vic-club
Senior Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 477



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: July 31, 2003, 05:18:45 AM »
0

Are FE one's the same?  If so, yesssssssssssssssssss pleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeasssssssssssssseeeeeeeeeee!!
Logged

Zoom zoom!
RET
Administrator
Guru
*****
Offline Offline

Model: FE
Posts: 5783



richard.e.thomas ret56fe
View Profile WWW
« Reply #6 on: July 31, 2003, 10:21:46 AM »
0

FE and FC are not the same.  FEs are circular, one per control, so total of four.  FC are oval, connecting the two controls on each side of the speedo together.  They were probably cheaper to make, but tend to crack down the middle, probably due to the void behind them in between the two controls as well as the reduced give that individual items would have (with the movement of the control in question, especially the left cable-operated jobs).

FB/EK ones are round like FE ones but have black backgrounds like FC ones.

So they're no use to you, Cat.  I didn't know about Chev ones being the same - that's an interesting tidbit.

cheers
RET
Logged

OurCarClub.com.au is a web-based data management application, custom built for car clubs and their volunteer officials. More info...
Cat
vic-club
Senior Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 477



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: July 31, 2003, 11:13:40 PM »
0

Bugger!  Cry
Logged

Zoom zoom!
RET
Administrator
Guru
*****
Offline Offline

Model: FE
Posts: 5783



richard.e.thomas ret56fe
View Profile WWW
« Reply #8 on: August 01, 2003, 12:47:59 AM »
0

I think good original FE ones are easier to come by anyway, for the longevity reasons outlined above.

cheers
RET
Logged

OurCarClub.com.au is a web-based data management application, custom built for car clubs and their volunteer officials. More info...
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Add bookmark  |  Print  

Share this topic...
In a forum (BBCode) 
In a site/blog (HTML)

 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.043 seconds with 21 queries.