|
Title: fe dog leg Post by: Gary C on November 23, 2012, 08:02:26 PM The rear dog leg section from the end of outer sill to top of wheel arch is non existent.
Iam now in Broome (my fe is in Perth) and I have an ek shell here and this section is in very good condition and looks the same as the fe. Question is are they in fact the same profile? .Thanks,Gary Title: Re: fe dog leg Post by: FCRB26 on November 23, 2012, 08:29:37 PM The rear doors are the same (except the top hoop) so im assuming they are the same...
And spats interchange so the profile is the same... ??? Wait for 1 of the gurus i would hate to be wrong and stuff you up. Pete Title: Re: fe dog leg Post by: NES304 on November 23, 2012, 08:42:39 PM Wait for 1 of the gurus i would hate to be wrong and stuff you up. Pete Title: Re: fe dog leg Post by: FCRB26 on November 23, 2012, 08:50:45 PM ;D IM 99 percent certain.
Title: Re: fe dog leg Post by: collecta on November 23, 2012, 08:55:36 PM At least ya tried ;D just checked my fe against my ek and they measure up the same, but spats dont interchange fe/fc differ to fb/ek. wheel arches are different at the rear on fb/ek
cheers Scott Title: Re: fe dog leg Post by: FCRB26 on November 23, 2012, 09:10:26 PM It must be those long spats that cover the while rear quarter IM thinking of.
Title: Re: fe dog leg Post by: Gary C on November 23, 2012, 10:57:02 PM Thanks fellas, thats good enough for me I will introduce the quick cut to the ek tomorrow.
Gary. |