newbie here - hi all!
sorry to skew slightly off topic here, and i certainly don't mean to offend - but smaller triple SUs on a six really do have their pitfalls compared to larger twin SUs on a six.
the main reason i say this is due to the tuneability of SUs. they're a kind of "set and forget" carb, but do have their problems especially when not set up correctly for unequal intake pulses - and believe me, it is quite difficult to get triples set up correctly on a sixpot.
for example, the intake pulses on a triple carb setup would be as follows with the firing order 1-5-3-6-2-4
carb 1 (front most carb) pulse-miss-miss-miss-pulse-miss-pulse
carb 2 (centre carb) miss-miss-pulse-miss-miss-pulse-miss
carb 3 (firewall carb) miss-pulse-miss-pulse-miss-miss-miss
now to the twin carb setup with the same firing order 1-5-3-6-2-4
carb 1 (front carb) pulse-miss-pulse-miss-pulse-miss
carb 2 (rear carb) miss-pulse-miss-pulse-miss-pulse
you can see that airflow is more constant thru the twin SUs (as will be fuel), therefore in incoming airspeed is held constant (or linear-ly rising under acceleration) there is more torque AND power to be had with twins.
using triples, the airspeed drops away under all those misses in a row and then the first cylinder to draw in on each carb (2,3/4 and 5) has to work a little harder than normal to bring airspeed back up which will affect performance.
sorry to be pedantic, but i've often wondered what holden were thinking when they decided to use triple SUs over twin SUs.
this is obviously only the go on heads with indivual inlet ports.