News:

Are you a member of one of the FE-FC Holden Car Clubs of Australia ? If you are, get access to the Club-Member-only area of this discussion board. Send an IM to the board admin, including your real name and club to get access.

Main Menu

fe rebody

Started by justin09, July 03, 2015, 11:24:34 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

justin09

Just wondering wpt people think about a rebody . Im looking at putting my fe onto a hq chassis ive asked an engineer and its all good to go ahead jyst wondering if anyone has done it and if so would u recommend  doing it . Thanx

FCRB26

Hq would be too wide.
Try rodeo or hilux are a better starting point.
I havent seen anyone doing this recently.
There were a few years ago doing different conversions.
But never to be seen again.

JB

Have a look at Harko's old thread... The nomad was on a Toyota crown frame.
Phone +64 223509263

mcl1959

I've wondered about narrowing and shortening a HQ chassis so that wheelbase and track are right. Joint would be done something similar to the way a HQ graft is put on a 57 Chev for example, but narrowed as well. You would need a narrowed diff, but that's nothing special. Narrowed Commodore rack for the front.

I've never seen or heard of this being attempted.  Maybe for good reason........

Ken

zulu


This has been discussed before using a 4x4 chassis, some of the results are not pretty, but beauty is in the eye of the beholder, just watch that first step getting out

There is an FJ 1 Toner running around, I spoke to the owner who told me if you have vehicle with no floor its a good stating point, this bloke had a CD on how to do it, so it might be out there on the web somewhere









NES304

Andrew McBean is doing a HQ under an EJ ute..... But he has not been on the forum in quite some time

Ps NoT a fan of the 4x4 ones!



Ed


I'm curious as to what the benefits of rebodying an FE or FC over an existing chassis are?

If you are looking for rigidity, then a 3/4 chassis is very effective.

If you are trying to incorporate new suspension, then I think it would be "easier".. (sorry the same amount of work) and more elegant to fabricate new rails and floor to suit your suspension and drive line.


Cheers

Ed
in the shed

Bob_FC_Ute

If my memory serves me well, I remember reading a Street Machine article about Peter Fitzpatrick's first build was on a HQ Chassis to get around ACT rego laws.

NES304

Hey Ed
The reason is the engine capacity is based on the chassis and not the car - read HQ = big block



Ed


Oh ...the Canadian big block
in the shed

FireKraka

From what I remember Peter Fitzpatricks stunning FC only had a HQ front sub chassis may be wrong

Regards
Neil H